The SNSF has commissioned studies and surveys to analyse certain aspects of its funding activities. In 2016, a Norwegian institute examined the evaluation procedure for National Centres of Competence in Research (NCCRs). The study praised the procedure, describing it as efficient and fit for purpose, but also made a number of recommendations. One of the recommended measures was to have each application assessed by at least three experts. The SNSF implemented the recommendations for the 5th series of NCCRs, for which it launched a call in October 2017.

The Compliance Committee, appointed by the SNSF Foundation Council, does random checks to ensure compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. One of its tasks has been to examine whether the SNSF communicates transparently, understandably and in the same manner with all of its applicants. For example, many researchers approach the SNSF with questions before submitting their application. The Administrative Offices are allowed to provide formal information, but no advice on scientific matters as this might give them an unfair advantage over other applicants.

It can be difficult to draw a clear line between information and advice. Nonetheless, the Compliance Committee has commended the Administrative Offices in this respect. At the same time, it has recommended making employees more aware of this issue and putting informal rules down in writing.

The committee is also examining processes to ensure that projects are always selected in accordance with the rules. “The SNSF makes every effort to protect the rights of researchers and provide high-quality funding services,” says the president of the committee, Franciska Krings. “And as a researcher, I am happy to play a part in this.”

The SNSF conducts a detailed internal monitoring of its decisions on an ongoing basis. For instance, it probed whether Research Council decisions show a preference for certain universities. No such tendencies were detected.

The internal audit takes a close look at the efficiency and effectiveness of processes. An example: how efficient are the SNSF Administrative Offices in checking whether applications meet the formal requirements? The Swiss Federal Audit Office (SFAO) checks the annual financial statements of the SNSF. Although the SNSF is a foundation under private law, it is funded by the Swiss federal government and therefore falls under the remit of the SFAO as external auditor.

In 2018, the SNSF will appoint an international advisory board composed of experts from the world of science and research funding, non-profit organisations and private companies. Their task will be to pinpoint any weaknesses in the SNSF’s funding activities and make proposals for strategic development.